Acer PackardBell Viseo 193ws Service Manual page 7

While customers who use faceplate as their primary means of budgeting server power will see the
capacity ah-some Lvel. In addition, while these measurements^were calculated at 100% CPU
load, most enterprise workloads do not consistently run at 100% CPU utilization. Customers
running applications at typical CPU loads may be able to set Dynamic Power Cap levels lower
than those shown in this exercise, and reclaim an even larger percentage of trapped power
Case 2. HP ProLiant BL460c G1 and G5 Servers
Comparisons of faceplate, power calculator, and SPECjbb benchmark with Dynamic Power
Capping for the BL460c G1 server and c7000 as well as the BL460c G5 server and c7000
enclosure are listed below (Tables 2 and 3). By leveraging Dynamic Power Capping at 100%
load, test results showed that, for a typical BL460c G1 configuration, users can potentially
ProLiant BL460c G5 server, the results are even more dramatic. Users can potentially increase the
Dynamic Power Capping afimax power, an increase of 100%. 9 P 9
$13,438 per server to $7,679 peTseLr, a decrease of 39%. For the ProLiant BL460c G5
$ 13,438 per server to $6,719 per server, adecrease of 49%.
Table 2. HP ProLiant BL460c G1 Server Power and Costs Projections
Faceplate Blade System Sizer
(Enclosure)
Enclosure Power 7,836 W 6,000 W
Dyarl
t BL460c G5 Server Power and Costs Projections
Enclosure Power 8,340 W
Blade System Sizer Load Testing and
(Enclosure) Dynamic Power Capping
4,722W 4,257 W